Written by David Curtin,
The U.S. Supreme Court does not hand down 8–1 rulings very often, especially on culture-war issues. So when this Court—this Court—lands almost unanimously on one side, it’s an earthquake.
Justices John Roberts, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, AND the Court’s conservatives all converged to say a particular law in Colorado was unconstitutional. Cue the earthquake.
The case has to do with “conversion therapy.” The term has been deceitfully used by LGBTQ proponents for many years to equate it with a barbaric practice.… Continue Reading
Tags: Chiles v. Salazar, DCFS, Elena Kagan, HB 4554, HB 4966, John Roberts, Kelly Cassidy, Laura Faver Dias, Sonia Sotomayor, U.S. Supreme Court
Federal Issues, Judicial Branch, LGBTQ Agenda | David E. Smith |
April 6, 2026 7:00 AM |
Comments Off on An 8–1 SCOTUS Warning Shot Illinois Can’t Ignore
Written by Dr. Everett Piper
On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard the cases of
Little v. Hecox and
West Virginia v. B.P.J. The plaintiffs are suing Idaho and West Virginia, respectively, for enacting laws that expressly prohibit men from competing in women’s athletics.
During oral arguments, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed her concerns. More specifically, she asked attorneys to defend why their clients are telling boys who pretend to be girls that they may not participate in girls’ sports.
…
Continue Reading
Tags: Alan Hurst, C.S. Lewis, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Lia Thomas, Little v. Hecox, Men in women's sports, The Abolition of Man, transgender athletes, U.S. Supreme Court, West Virginia v. B.P.J.
Federal Issues, Judicial Branch, LGBTQ Agenda | David E. Smith |
January 21, 2026 5:00 AM |
Comments Off on The Erasure of Women Comes to the U.S. Supreme Court
Written by David E. Smith
The U.S. Supreme Court delivered an important decision this week by ruling that Illinois Republican Congressman Mike Bost (R-Murphysboro) has legal standing to challenge Illinois’ controversial mail-in ballot law. The 7–2 decision in Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections doesn’t decide whether the law itself is constitutional — but it opens the courthouse door for candidates to hold election rules accountable in court.
At issue is an Illinois statute that allows mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted up to two weeks afterward.… Continue Reading
Tags: Amy Coney Barrett, Election integrity, Elena Kagan, John Roberts, Ketanji Brown Jackson, mail-in ballots, mail-in voting, Mike Bost, Sonia Sotomayor, U.S. Supreme Court
Federal Issues, Voter Integrity | David E. Smith |
January 15, 2026 10:00 AM |
Comments Off on Good News Regarding Bost’s Challenge to Illinois’ Late-Counted Ballots
Written by Tom Fitton, Judicial Watch
Under federal law, Election Day in the United States is not two days, two weeks or two months. It is a single day. That anyone might insist otherwise is difficult to imagine.
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections, a case challenging Illinois’ decision to count mail-in-ballots that arrive up to 14 days after Election Day. For 80 years, Election Day has been held on the same day in November.… Continue Reading
Written by Daniel Horowitz
Gay marriage was not just a step down the slippery slope toward today’s transgender dystopia. It was the first manifestation of it. Now that a broad reawakening has exposed the harms of gender ideology and the denial of natural law, Republicans must press beyond protecting women’s sports and opposing child castration. They must return to the root of the problem: the redefinition of marriage itself.
Marriage is the foundation of human civilization, not a mere “social construct.”… Continue Reading
Tags: Daniel Horowitz, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health, Glucksberg, Kim Davis, Mike Johnson, Obergefell, Pavan v. Smith, Roe v. Wade, same-sex marriage, U.S. Supreme Court
LGBTQ Agenda, Marriage, Family & Culture | David E. Smith |
September 10, 2025 7:00 AM |
Comments Off on How Gay ‘Marriage’ Made Today’s Gender Madness Possible
Written by David E. Smith
In a case that could have national implications for election integrity, the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear Judicial Watch, Inc. et al. v. The Illinois State Board of Elections, a lawsuit brought on behalf of U.S. Representative Mike Bost (R-Murphysboro) and two presidential electors. At the heart of the case is whether Illinois acted unlawfully by allowing mail-in ballots to be counted up to 14 days after the federally established Election Day.… Continue Reading
Tags: Election Day, Judicial Watch, Mike Bost, National Voter Registration Act, Tom Fitton, U.S. Supreme Court
Federal Issues, Illinois Politics, Judicial Branch, Political, Voter Integrity, Voter Integrity, Voter Integrity | David E. Smith |
July 25, 2025 6:00 AM |
Comments Off on SCOTUS to Hear Challenge to Illinois’ Extension of Election Day
Written by Dr. Everett Piper
Last week, Baylor University announced that it had received a grant of approximately $700,000 from the Baugh Foundation to promote LGBTQ inclusivity on its campus. Baylor’s motto is “For the Church, For Texas, For the World.” It describes itself as a Christian university and is a proud member of the Council of Christian Colleges and Universities, otherwise known as the CCCU.
What exactly is the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities?… Continue Reading
Written by Robert Knight
If you still doubt whether elections have consequences, the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on a Tennessee statute last week should clarify things.
In a 6-3 ruling, the high court upheld a state law protecting minors from transgender experimentation that includes puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and, in some cases, surgical removal of healthy body parts. In other words, permanent child abuse.
All six of the Republican-appointed justices voted in United States v. Skrmetti to protect children and reject radical transgender ideology.… Continue Reading
Tags: Abigail Spanberger, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Anthony M. Kennedy, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Dobbs v. Jackson, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, Elena Kagan, Elissa Slotkin, Jack Ciattarelli, Joe Biden, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Mikie Sherrill, Newt Gingrich, Obergefell, Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act, Sonia Sotomayor, The Washington Post, U.S. Supreme Court, United States v. Skrmetti, Winsome Earle-Sears
Federal Issues, Judicial Branch | David E. Smith |
June 23, 2025 6:30 AM |
Comments Off on GOP Must Tie All Democrats To The Party’s Radical Policies And Appointees
Written by Daniel Horowitz
To this day, courts insist you have no right to bodily autonomy when it comes to coerced vaccination and forced masking. They cite the “police powers” of the state as justification. But when the state uses those same powers to regulate public nudity or sexually explicit drag shows in front of children, suddenly the judiciary rediscovers the First Amendment.
In 2023, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed SB 1438, a commonsense law that barred businesses from knowingly admitting children to “adult live performances.”… Continue Reading
Tags: 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, 14th Amendment, adult performances, Alien Enemies Act, Civil Rights Act of 1866, Clarence Thomas, Comstock Act of 1873, Daniel Horowitz, drag queens, Equal Protection Clause, Fifth Circuit, First Amendment, Hamburger Mary, James F. Wilson, lewd exposure, Neil Gorsuch, nudity, Ron DeSantis, Samuel Alito, sexual conduct, sexual excitement, U.S. Supreme Court
LGBTQ Agenda | David E. Smith |
May 21, 2025 5:00 AM |
Comments Off on The Courts Side With Drag Queens Over Parents … Again
Written by Dr. Everett Piper
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard the case of St. Isidore v. Drummond, whereby Oklahoma’s attorney general, Gentner Drummond, is suing to deny Oklahoma parents the right to choose to send their children to a board-approved charter school with a 100% graduation rate and 98% of its students matriculating to college.
In a state where traditional public schools are ranked among some of the worst in the nation, why would Mr. … Continue Reading
Tags: Bernard Sanders, David Brewer, David Hogg, Donald Trump, First Amendment, Gavin Newsom, Gentner Drummond, James Madison, Joe Biden, MAGA Republican, St. Isidore v. Drummond, Theodore Roosevelt, Thomas Jefferson, U.S. Supreme Court, wall of separation
Political | David E. Smith |
May 8, 2025 5:00 AM |
Comments Off on MAGA Doesn’t Need More RINOs