SCOTUS Redistricting Ruling Sparks Pushback from Pritzker
Written by David E. Smith
Governor JB Pritzker sharply criticized the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent ruling on race-based redistricting, calling it “an attack on a crown jewel of our democracy.”
The Court ruled 6–3 that Louisiana’s addition of a second majority-black congressional district constituted an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. The decision is expected to narrow how the Voting Rights Act is applied moving forward—particularly in cases involving race-based districting.
Speaking to Chicago media, Pritzker said,
“Illinois is the proud home of having sent more black members of Congress to Washington than any other state in the country. And the Voting Rights Act is under attack… We’re not going to stand for it in Illinois. We’re going to push back. We have options for pushing back, and that is under discussion with the legislature, even today.”
Stephanie Trussell, an Illinois Family Action board member and black Republican candidate for state representative in DuPage, offered a different perspective:
“The Voting Rights Act was passed in 1965 to outlaw discriminatory voting practices like poll taxes and literacy tests. Those goals have been achieved. Today, black Americans have equal access to the ballot. In Illinois, it is Republicans who are often underrepresented due to how congressional maps are drawn.
This decision affirms that fair representation should be achieved through lawful, race-neutral processes that strengthen trust in our elections.”
Governor Pritzker, and other woke Democrats across the country, appear to believe there is an obligation to draw districts in a way that produces certain racial outcomes, to both diversify legislative bodies and to secure political advantage. The truth is, Democrats have little interest in supporting black or Hispanic Republicans. The underlying priority is not simply minority representation, but advancing a left-wing worldview, expanding government programs, and enacting other regressive policies.
The purpose of representative government is to allow citizens to elect government officials who will act in their best interests. Yet a look at Illinois’ congressional map raises serious questions. Nine out of 17 congressional districts are anchored in Chicago and stretch outward into suburban, exurban, and even rural communities—areas with vastly different concerns and priorities.
In election after election, the dense urban vote in Chicago overwhelms the voices of voters in outlying areas within these districts. This is not accidental. These districts are drawn to produce predictable outcomes—favoring Democrat candidates of color while diluting the influence of other communities.
Ironically, even late-night liberal host Stephen Colbert has acknowledged how problematic Illinois’ congressional maps have become. In a conversation with Governor JB Pritzker last summer, Colbert pointed to the state’s oddly drawn districts, saying:
If you are considering doing a little more redrawing in Illinois, you already have some crazy districts in Illinois. Take a look at this. Look at [district] 17 here. It does that, then it comes up here, and it sneaks around there and goes all the way up here and then goes right over there like that…
Pastor James Pittman of New Hope Community Church in Palatine, who also serves on the Illinois Family Action board, offered a broader perspective rooted in biblical truth:
“Someone once said, in essence, ‘Don’t judge me by the color of my skin, but by the content of my character.’ I still believe in that notion, especially as a Christian. God judges the heart, not the color of our skin.”
You can watch and listen to Governor Pritzker’s comments in this short video:
This content was composed and finalized by the author.
IFA staff and AI tools were used for proofing and clarity.


