<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fong Yue Ting v. U.S.</title>
	<atom:link href="https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/tag/fong-yue-ting-v-u-s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://illinoisfamilyaction.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 13:49:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">76203252</site>	<item>
		<title>The Legal Case Against Anchor-Baby Citizenship Revisited</title>
		<link>https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2025/01/the-legal-case-against-anchor-baby-citizenship-revisited/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David E. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 11:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14th Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anchor-Baby Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Exclusion Acts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Horowitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Felix Frankfurter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fong Yue Ting v. U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hebrew Aid Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horace Gray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ignatz Mezei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaplan v. Tod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nishimura Ekiu v. U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaughnessy v. U.S. ex rel. Mezei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zadvydas v. Davis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/?p=28683</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Written by Daniel Horowitz</em></p>
<p>Do we, as a society, hold the inviolable right to control our sovereignty and, through our elected representatives, prevent individuals from asserting immigration and citizenship rights against our will? Or do foreign nationals and governments possess the authority to assert jurisdiction in our country, obtaining citizenship and its accompanying rights — without recourse for our citizens to oppose it, even prospectively? Those are the key questions before us as we navigate our journey as a nation-state.&#8230; <a href="https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2025/01/the-legal-case-against-anchor-baby-citizenship-revisited/" class="read-more">Continue Reading </a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28683</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
