<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Antonin Scalia</title>
	<atom:link href="https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/tag/antonin-scalia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://illinoisfamilyaction.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 13:49:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">76203252</site>	<item>
		<title>The Legal Case Against Anchor-Baby Citizenship Revisited</title>
		<link>https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2025/01/the-legal-case-against-anchor-baby-citizenship-revisited/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David E. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 11:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14th Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anchor-Baby Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Exclusion Acts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Horowitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Felix Frankfurter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fong Yue Ting v. U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hebrew Aid Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horace Gray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ignatz Mezei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaplan v. Tod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nishimura Ekiu v. U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaughnessy v. U.S. ex rel. Mezei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zadvydas v. Davis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/?p=28683</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Written by Daniel Horowitz</em></p>
<p>Do we, as a society, hold the inviolable right to control our sovereignty and, through our elected representatives, prevent individuals from asserting immigration and citizenship rights against our will? Or do foreign nationals and governments possess the authority to assert jurisdiction in our country, obtaining citizenship and its accompanying rights — without recourse for our citizens to oppose it, even prospectively? Those are the key questions before us as we navigate our journey as a nation-state.&#8230; <a href="https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2025/01/the-legal-case-against-anchor-baby-citizenship-revisited/" class="read-more">Continue Reading </a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28683</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Roberts and Kavanaugh Stand With the Unborn or the Unjust?</title>
		<link>https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2021/05/will-roberts-and-kavanaugh-stand-with-the-unborn-or-the-unjust/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David E. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2021 12:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brett Kavanaug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Souter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garza v. Hargan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[June Medical Services v. Russo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karen Henderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Gorsuch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood v. Casey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruth Bader Ginsburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samuel Alito]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Day O'Connor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonia Sotomayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Breyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://staging.illinoisfamilyaction.org/?p=17442</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Written by Terence P. Jeffrey</em></p>
<p>Chief Justice <strong>John Roberts</strong> and Justice <strong>Brett Kavanaug</strong>h, both nominated by Republican presidents, have both written absurd opinions on abortion laws.</p>
<p>The case of <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/dobbs-v-jackson-womens-health-organization/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Dobbs v. Jackson Women&#8217;s Health</em></a>, which the U.S. Supreme Court will hear this year, could give them an opportunity to redeem themselves.</p>
<p>At issue in this case is a Mississippi law that bans most abortions after a baby&#8217;s 15th gestational week. The question: Can a state prohibit doctors from killing unborn babies who are not yet old enough to survive outside the womb?&#8230; <a href="https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2021/05/will-roberts-and-kavanaugh-stand-with-the-unborn-or-the-unjust/" class="read-more">Continue Reading </a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">17442</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>16 Questions Conservatives Should Ask Any SCOTUS Nominee</title>
		<link>https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2020/09/16-questions-conservatives-should-ask-any-scotus-nominee/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David E. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14th Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona v. United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill of RIghts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bladensburg cross case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bostock v. Clayton County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights Act of 1964]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Due Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education Amendments Act of 1972]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eighth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equal Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Establishment Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Griggs v. Duke Power Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Marshall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Nominations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Gorsuch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obergefell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patchak v. Zinke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plyler v. Doe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privileges and Immunities Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supremacy Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title VII of the Civil Rights Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zadvydas v. Davis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://staging.illinoisfamilyaction.org/?p=15343</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Written by Daniel Horowitz</em></p>
<p>Democrats never have any doubts about their court nominees. They know with certainty that once their picks are on the court, they will be willing to do anything in a real case to interpret the U.S. Constitution the way they see it. They will rule with the party&#8217;s preferred political outcomes regardless of past precedent or the plain meaning of the Constitution. There is no reason why conservatives cannot <a href="https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/ready-horowitz-no-more-stealth-nominees-use-the-conservative-litmus-test-on-scotus-candidates" target="_self" rel="noopener noreferrer">have that same confidence that GOP nominees will rule</a> on the side of the original meaning of the U.S.&#8230; <a href="https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2020/09/16-questions-conservatives-should-ask-any-scotus-nominee/" class="read-more">Continue Reading </a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15343</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Let Them &#8220;Bork&#8221; Judge Kavanaugh</title>
		<link>https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2018/07/dont-let-them-bork-judge-kavanaugh/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David E. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Blankschaen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brett Kavanaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Meese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Hyde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Bork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules for Radicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samuel Alito]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saul Alinsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Kennedy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://staging.illinoisfamilyaction.org/?p=9543</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Written by Dr. Jerry Newcombe</em></p>
<p>Soon the U.S. Senate will hold hearings as to whether or not to confirm Judge <strong>Brett Kavanaugh</strong> to the U.S. Supreme Court. One can only imagine the fireworks to come.</p>
<p>Beware of the Saul Alinsky model of the politics of personal destruction. <strong>Saul Alinksy</strong>, a Marxist and the father of the community organizers, wrote <em>Rules for Radicals </em>(1971), in which he states, “In a fight almost anything goes. It almost reaches the point where you stop to apologize if a chance blow lands <em>above </em>the belt” (pp.&#8230; <a href="https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2018/07/dont-let-them-bork-judge-kavanaugh/" class="read-more">Continue Reading </a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">9543</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good Riddance to Justice Anthony Kennedy</title>
		<link>https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2018/07/good-riddance-to-justice-anthony-kennedy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David E. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 10:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Sharpton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily Bazelon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Toobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrick Garland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Gorsuch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obergefell v. Hodges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood v. Casey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rusty Reno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walter Sobchack]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://staging.illinoisfamilyaction.org/?p=9371</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Written by Taylor Lewis</em></p>
<p>The U.S. Supreme Court’s longest serving justice announced his retirement shortly after casting the deciding vote on a string of decisions that were seen as wins for the conservative side of the bench. Kennedy’s stepping down didn’t come as a surprise. There have long been rumors in Washington that he was considering hanging up his robe. With a Republican-controlled Congress and White House, the timing couldn’t be better, so as to ensure his seat would be filled with someone from the right side of the ideological spectrum.&#8230; <a href="https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2018/07/good-riddance-to-justice-anthony-kennedy/" class="read-more">Continue Reading </a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">9371</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>4 Likes, 2 Dislikes from Trump’s First 50 Days</title>
		<link>https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2017/03/4-likes-2-dislikes-from-trumps-first-50-days/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David E. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Betsy DeVos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Common Core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald J. Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fake news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyde Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrick Garland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico City Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Gorsuch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trump Administration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://staging.illinoisfamilyaction.org/?p=7279</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/DonaldTrump.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7280" src="https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/DonaldTrump.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="300" srcset="https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/DonaldTrump.jpg 600w, https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/DonaldTrump-300x150.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" /></a></p>
<p><em>Written by Jon Schweppe</em></p>
<p>Generally, the first 50 days of the Trump Administration have been an absolute joy to watch. The media and the Left have been apoplectic as President <strong>Donald J. Trump</strong> largely honors his campaign promises and does exactly what he said he would do. Truthfully, Trump has been everything we hoped he would be and more.</p>
<p>Still, that’s not to say there haven’t been some disappointments. Here are four things I like and two things I dislike from the first 50 days:</p>
<h3><span style="color: #ff6600;"><strong>Like: U.S.</strong></span></h3>&#8230; <a href="https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2017/03/4-likes-2-dislikes-from-trumps-first-50-days/" class="read-more">Continue Reading </a>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7279</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Supremely Bad Nominee</title>
		<link>https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2016/03/obamas-supremely-bad-nominee/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David E. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Blackmun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrick Garland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Brennan]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifaction.wpengine.com/?p=5926</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ifaction.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/garland-obama.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5928" src="http://ifaction.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/garland-obama.jpg" alt="garland-obama" width="566" height="300" srcset="https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/garland-obama.jpg 566w, https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/garland-obama-300x159.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 566px) 100vw, 566px" /></a></p>
<p><em>Written by Gary L. Bauer</em></p>
<p>At the White House this morning, President Obama announced his nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court &#8212; Judge <strong>Merrick Garland</strong> of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.</p>
<p>The media are dutifully attempting to spin Garland as a &#8220;centrist&#8221; or a &#8220;consensus choice.&#8221; Consider this headline from the <em>Los Angeles Times:</em> &#8220;It&#8217;s Going To Be Hard For Conservatives To Oppose The Careful, Moderate Merrick Garland.&#8221;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be fooled, my friends.&#8230; <a href="https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2016/03/obamas-supremely-bad-nominee/" class="read-more">Continue Reading </a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5926</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Would Trump Appoint to the U.S. Supreme Court?</title>
		<link>https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2015/12/who-would-trump-appoint-to-the-supreme-court/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David E. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 14:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryanne Trump Barry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifaction.wpengine.com/?p=5150</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Written by Frank Cannon </em></p>
<p><strong>Donald Trump</strong> says a lot of things. We’ve become all too used to that now. Some of these things should probably be taken with a grain of salt — <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9lcr-wsYOk">“Only Rosie O’Donnell” comes to mind</a> — but some deserve to be analyzed more closely.</p>
<p class="Body">Here’s an example. Remember Trump’s discussion about U.S. Supreme Court Justices back in August with <em>Bloomberg Politics</em>? <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/videos/2015-08-26/donald-trump-the-full-with-all-due-respect-interview">Mark Halperin asked Trump</a>, “Is there someone out there today who isn’t on the [Supreme Court], but say, this is the kind of person I would consider for the court?&#8230; <a href="https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2015/12/who-would-trump-appoint-to-the-supreme-court/" class="read-more">Continue Reading </a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">5150</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
