<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>14th Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/tag/14th-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://illinoisfamilyaction.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 10:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">76203252</site>	<item>
		<title>The Courts Side With Drag Queens Over Parents &#8230; Again</title>
		<link>https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2025/05/the-courts-side-with-drag-queens-over-parents-again/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David E. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 10:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[LGBTQ Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11th Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14th Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adult performances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alien Enemies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights Act of 1866]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comstock Act of 1873]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Horowitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drag queens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equal Protection Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifth Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamburger Mary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James F. Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lewd exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Gorsuch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron DeSantis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samuel Alito]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual excitement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/?p=29609</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Written by Daniel Horowitz</em></p>
<p>To this day, courts insist you have no right to bodily autonomy when it comes to coerced vaccination and forced masking. They cite the “police powers” of the state as justification. But when the state uses those same powers to regulate public nudity or sexually explicit drag shows in front of children, suddenly the judiciary rediscovers the First Amendment.</p>
<p>In 2023, Florida Gov. <strong>Ron DeSantis</strong> signed <a class="rm-stats-tracked" href="https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2023/1438/BillText/er/HTML" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">SB 1438</a>, a commonsense law that barred businesses from knowingly admitting children to “adult live performances.”&#8230; <a href="https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2025/05/the-courts-side-with-drag-queens-over-parents-again/" class="read-more">Continue Reading </a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29609</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Legal Case Against Anchor-Baby Citizenship Revisited</title>
		<link>https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2025/01/the-legal-case-against-anchor-baby-citizenship-revisited/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David E. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 11:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14th Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anchor-Baby Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Exclusion Acts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Horowitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Felix Frankfurter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fong Yue Ting v. U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hebrew Aid Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horace Gray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ignatz Mezei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaplan v. Tod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nishimura Ekiu v. U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaughnessy v. U.S. ex rel. Mezei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zadvydas v. Davis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/?p=28683</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Written by Daniel Horowitz</em></p>
<p>Do we, as a society, hold the inviolable right to control our sovereignty and, through our elected representatives, prevent individuals from asserting immigration and citizenship rights against our will? Or do foreign nationals and governments possess the authority to assert jurisdiction in our country, obtaining citizenship and its accompanying rights — without recourse for our citizens to oppose it, even prospectively? Those are the key questions before us as we navigate our journey as a nation-state.&#8230; <a href="https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2025/01/the-legal-case-against-anchor-baby-citizenship-revisited/" class="read-more">Continue Reading </a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28683</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>16 Questions Conservatives Should Ask Any SCOTUS Nominee</title>
		<link>https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2020/09/16-questions-conservatives-should-ask-any-scotus-nominee/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David E. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14th Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona v. United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill of RIghts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bladensburg cross case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bostock v. Clayton County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights Act of 1964]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Due Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education Amendments Act of 1972]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eighth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equal Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Establishment Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Griggs v. Duke Power Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Marshall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Nominations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Gorsuch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obergefell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patchak v. Zinke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plyler v. Doe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privileges and Immunities Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supremacy Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title VII of the Civil Rights Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zadvydas v. Davis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://staging.illinoisfamilyaction.org/?p=15343</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Written by Daniel Horowitz</em></p>
<p>Democrats never have any doubts about their court nominees. They know with certainty that once their picks are on the court, they will be willing to do anything in a real case to interpret the U.S. Constitution the way they see it. They will rule with the party&#8217;s preferred political outcomes regardless of past precedent or the plain meaning of the Constitution. There is no reason why conservatives cannot <a href="https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/ready-horowitz-no-more-stealth-nominees-use-the-conservative-litmus-test-on-scotus-candidates" target="_self" rel="noopener noreferrer">have that same confidence that GOP nominees will rule</a> on the side of the original meaning of the U.S.&#8230; <a href="https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2020/09/16-questions-conservatives-should-ask-any-scotus-nominee/" class="read-more">Continue Reading </a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15343</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
