<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>11th Circuit Court of Appeals</title>
	<atom:link href="https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/tag/11th-circuit-court-of-appeals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://illinoisfamilyaction.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 10:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">76203252</site>	<item>
		<title>The Courts Side With Drag Queens Over Parents &#8230; Again</title>
		<link>https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2025/05/the-courts-side-with-drag-queens-over-parents-again/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David E. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 10:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[LGBTQ Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11th Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14th Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adult performances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alien Enemies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights Act of 1866]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comstock Act of 1873]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Horowitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drag queens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equal Protection Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifth Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamburger Mary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James F. Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lewd exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Gorsuch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron DeSantis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samuel Alito]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual excitement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/?p=29609</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><em>Written by Daniel Horowitz</em></p>
<p>To this day, courts insist you have no right to bodily autonomy when it comes to coerced vaccination and forced masking. They cite the “police powers” of the state as justification. But when the state uses those same powers to regulate public nudity or sexually explicit drag shows in front of children, suddenly the judiciary rediscovers the First Amendment.</p>
<p>In 2023, Florida Gov. <strong>Ron DeSantis</strong> signed <a class="rm-stats-tracked" href="https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2023/1438/BillText/er/HTML" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">SB 1438</a>, a commonsense law that barred businesses from knowingly admitting children to “adult live performances.”&#8230; <a href="https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/2025/05/the-courts-side-with-drag-queens-over-parents-again/" class="read-more">Continue Reading </a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29609</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Making the Christian Case Against Homosexuality&#8221; (Illinois Family Spotlight #228)</title>
		<link>https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/podcast/making-the-christian-case-against-homosexuality-illinois-family-spotlight-228/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin D. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 06:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[11th Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britt Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gagnon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bib]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Bible]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://staging.illinoisfamilyaction.org/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=16461</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Making the Christian case against homosexuality has always been a great challenge in our engagement with the world, going all the way back to Genesis and the account of Sodom and Gomorrah. The biblical opposition to homosexual practice is especially relevant in light of the <a href="https://illinoisfamily.org/homosexuality/ordinances-banning-sexual-orientation-change-efforts-are-unconstitutional-says-11th-circuit/">new ruling</a> by Circuit Judge <strong>Britt Grant</strong> of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals regarding &#8220;reparative therapy,&#8221; whereby individuals with homosexual attractions <em>willingly</em> seek out pastoral or professional counseling to help them fight that specific sin.&#8230; <a href="https://illinoisfamilyaction.org/podcast/making-the-christian-case-against-homosexuality-illinois-family-spotlight-228/" class="read-more">Continue Reading </a></p>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">16461</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
